Grinding And Rumbling Under The Car

Engine, fuel system, cooling system, heating, carburetors, exhaust, transmission, wheels, and other items related to the moving the car.

Moderator: Dan Szwarc

frasern
Addicted to Lincolns
Posts: 1337
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:09 pm
Location: North Battleford, Saskatchewan
Contact:

Re: Grinding And Rumbling Under The Car

Post by frasern »

Glad that worked out. My '67 front had the worn ball you mentioned, so I swapped in my '66 driveshaft. Someone picked up the '68 with a forklift before I got it, so I have no extras available. ( I have a video of the '68 slapping the floor, but can't post it here.)
A little off topic, but I put a '63 driveshaft in my '62, and they are different! The front u joint is larger.
Fraser Noble, Western Canada
'62 and '67 LCC.
User avatar
TonyC
TLFer for Life
Posts: 10750
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 1:01 am
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Re: Grinding And Rumbling Under The Car, CURED

Post by TonyC »

Thank you, Wayne! :grin: It feels really good to have folks cheering me on, even more so considering how few there are in general.

Wow, Fraser, I didn't know that! I was always under the impression that the drive shaft was unchanged from '61 thru '63, making it interchangeable among those years. (EDIT, 18 May: Actually, I should have known this already, being that I read it before. Based on your discovery, I did a little review research, and it turns out that both Car Life and Motor Trend made note of larger universal joints being installed as an upgrade for 1963. So, what you saw was not an unlucky fluke, but a production fact. In a case like this, a MPC's part-number listing would prove important.)

More often than not, Dan, you'd be right; it's usually the rear joint that breaks up first, which was the case twice with me, once with Grand's Man-Of-War, and once with Frankenstein. I am aware of the kind of noise the rear joint gives off when it's failing (which was not what I was hearing). But not this time; it was the front joint. I can't help but wonder how long I had driven it like that, being how dry and chewed up inside that yoke was, before finally giving me warning signs while I was in Florida. But, at least the grinding damage was restricted only to that yoke.

I am thankful that I do not need to pursue another drive shaft after all. I should have, because that center-socket yoke was bone-dry and eating itself up; but the stud had no sign of wear or damage, which was such a relief to see. I did, however, remember how much of a frustration rebuilding a double-cardan joint can be. But, I used all-new parts for it this time, so it ought to last another good quarter-million miles. Can't say the same for the rear joint, but it was in much better shape, and I touched up the grease on all three parts of it yesterday and today. However, when I can, I want to get another C-S yoke, for the rear when its time comes. Since I learned that one piece is now beyond the reach of parts stores, it may be good to take proactive measures to acquire one.

It feels so nice now: No grinding noise (I thought I still heard some, but that was likely paranoia that had been building for the past month), and no shaking or rumbling. Car should be ready for the highways now.

---Tony
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet, just because there is a picture with a quote next to it." (Abraham Lincoln, 1866)
"Question Authority!"

1966 Continental Sedan, affectionately known as "Frankenstein" until body restoration is done (to be renamed "General Sherman" on that event)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest