1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
Moderator: Dan Szwarc
1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
Why some af the marks dont have a passenger side mirror?
I did my research and couldnt find out.
I did my research and couldnt find out.
- Dan Szwarc
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30329
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2000 1:01 am
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
Because it was optional. And the mirrors sucked, functionally.
The below links are mostly dead.
Dan Szwarc: 1966 Convertible
Shop Manual or MPCs available
Signature rules.
Help the forum for 2025.
Dan Szwarc: 1966 Convertible
Shop Manual or MPCs available
Signature rules.
Help the forum for 2025.
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
I get that it was optional, but how can it be that bad at doing its job
- Dan Szwarc
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30329
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2000 1:01 am
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
It wasn’t curved so the viewing size is terrible. Plus, 70s mirrors are half the size of modern mirrors.
If you want one, go for it. But IMHO it’s not worth passing up a really nice car without one.
If you want one, go for it. But IMHO it’s not worth passing up a really nice car without one.
The below links are mostly dead.
Dan Szwarc: 1966 Convertible
Shop Manual or MPCs available
Signature rules.
Help the forum for 2025.
Dan Szwarc: 1966 Convertible
Shop Manual or MPCs available
Signature rules.
Help the forum for 2025.
- Lee
- Addicted to Lincolns
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:15 am
- Location: Patriot, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
One advantage is that objects in the mirror are NOT closer than they appear.
1930 A Coupe
1941 LC Coupe
1968 XR-7 (my great-grandfather’s)
1962 LC Sedan (owned 35 years & driven 100k+ myself)
1941 LC Coupe
1968 XR-7 (my great-grandfather’s)
1962 LC Sedan (owned 35 years & driven 100k+ myself)
-
- Addicted to Lincolns
- Posts: 1585
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:09 pm
- Location: North Battleford, Saskatchewan
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
I think I have one if needed, cheap! And, you can have a glass shop cut curved glass for them, but it just won't be "right".
If you can't turn your head, it is worth installing one. I have a crushed disc, so I have had to add lame right hand mirrors. You do what you gotta do.
If you can't turn your head, it is worth installing one. I have a crushed disc, so I have had to add lame right hand mirrors. You do what you gotta do.
Fraser Noble, Western Canada
'62 and '67 LCC.
'62 and '67 LCC.
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
I really appreciate all the responds, I haven't got the mark 4 yet, but soon it's the first time I feel love at first sight towards any car. It's really unique.
The pictures below are mine and it is the same car that I want to buy.
The pictures below are mine and it is the same car that I want to buy.
- Lee
- Addicted to Lincolns
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:15 am
- Location: Patriot, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
I like it! William Conrad would approve.
1930 A Coupe
1941 LC Coupe
1968 XR-7 (my great-grandfather’s)
1962 LC Sedan (owned 35 years & driven 100k+ myself)
1941 LC Coupe
1968 XR-7 (my great-grandfather’s)
1962 LC Sedan (owned 35 years & driven 100k+ myself)
-
- Addicted to Lincolns
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:57 pm
- Location: St. George. Maine
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
Enjoy the car but feed us your problems. We can sometimes help you out, and if we can't we'll make something up! Wayne
- TonyC
- TLFer for Life
- Posts: 11084
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
- Contact:
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
I have to (respectfully) disagree with Dan's assessment. A starboard-side mirror is always an advantage, as long as you learn how to properly adjust it. Even the poorly-engineered mirror options of the late-'60s are better than nothing, despite the design flaw in them...which, incidentally, the '70s mirrors do not have.
The superiority of panoramic distortion (the curve Dan was referring to) is debatable at best; I personally tend to be in Lee's camp on that topic, preferring to see objects in the mirror as close as they actually are. The late, great, iconic Leo Gallagher once stabbed at that distortion as well.
But, in any case, you can do no less than upgrade your field of rear vision with a starboard-side mirror. Some countries won't even permit operation of a car without one, regardless of age; though luckily America is not among those fascists (not sure if the UAE has rules like those). Here, if a car was not fitted from the factory with something that is considered mandatory now, it is exempt from those mandates. An owner can choose to retrofit any such items if he/she chooses, for good measure or for upgrade purposes; but such retrofits are not ever required.
In the 20 years I've had a starboard mirror on my car, not once have I driven without looking at it. Granted, part of that is simply aesthetics–I love the symmetrical appearance. But also, when properly adjusted, it actually does serve the purpose it's supposed to serve...however barely, due to the design flaw.
If/When you do acquire and install one for your prospective car, you must remember this very important rule regarding adjustment. It is supposed to be adjusted in conjunction with the central mirror, the one on the windshield. It is supposed to pick up line of sight that terminates at the central mirror's right edge. That means, for instance, as soon as a passing car's tail end is moving out of view of the central mirror's right-hand edge, the nose end of the same car should already be in the view of the starboard mirror. Ergo, no blind spot. But too many people–in fact, just about everybody in America save for me–adjust that mirror to show the side of their own vehicles. They're all wrong. If you see the side of your car in that mirror, you're just as blind as though the mirror were not even there.
---Tony
The superiority of panoramic distortion (the curve Dan was referring to) is debatable at best; I personally tend to be in Lee's camp on that topic, preferring to see objects in the mirror as close as they actually are. The late, great, iconic Leo Gallagher once stabbed at that distortion as well.
But, in any case, you can do no less than upgrade your field of rear vision with a starboard-side mirror. Some countries won't even permit operation of a car without one, regardless of age; though luckily America is not among those fascists (not sure if the UAE has rules like those). Here, if a car was not fitted from the factory with something that is considered mandatory now, it is exempt from those mandates. An owner can choose to retrofit any such items if he/she chooses, for good measure or for upgrade purposes; but such retrofits are not ever required.
In the 20 years I've had a starboard mirror on my car, not once have I driven without looking at it. Granted, part of that is simply aesthetics–I love the symmetrical appearance. But also, when properly adjusted, it actually does serve the purpose it's supposed to serve...however barely, due to the design flaw.
If/When you do acquire and install one for your prospective car, you must remember this very important rule regarding adjustment. It is supposed to be adjusted in conjunction with the central mirror, the one on the windshield. It is supposed to pick up line of sight that terminates at the central mirror's right edge. That means, for instance, as soon as a passing car's tail end is moving out of view of the central mirror's right-hand edge, the nose end of the same car should already be in the view of the starboard mirror. Ergo, no blind spot. But too many people–in fact, just about everybody in America save for me–adjust that mirror to show the side of their own vehicles. They're all wrong. If you see the side of your car in that mirror, you're just as blind as though the mirror were not even there.
---Tony
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet, just because there is a picture with a quote next to it." (Abraham Lincoln, 1866)
"Question Authority!"
1966 Continental Sedan, affectionately known as "Frankenstein" until body restoration is done (to be renamed "General Sherman" on that event)
2006 Ford Mustang GT Convertible, affectionately dubbed "Trigger"
"Question Authority!"
1966 Continental Sedan, affectionately known as "Frankenstein" until body restoration is done (to be renamed "General Sherman" on that event)
2006 Ford Mustang GT Convertible, affectionately dubbed "Trigger"
Re: 1975 Mark IV passenger side mirror
Thanks for sharing the informations, When I own it, I'll take the installation information into consideration.TonyC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:48 am I have to (respectfully) disagree with Dan's assessment. A starboard-side mirror is always an advantage, as long as you learn how to properly adjust it. Even the poorly-engineered mirror options of the late-'60s are better than nothing, despite the design flaw in them...which, incidentally, the '70s mirrors do not have.
The superiority of panoramic distortion (the curve Dan was referring to) is debatable at best; I personally tend to be in Lee's camp on that topic, preferring to see objects in the mirror as close as they actually are. The late, great, iconic Leo Gallagher once stabbed at that distortion as well.
But, in any case, you can do no less than upgrade your field of rear vision with a starboard-side mirror. Some countries won't even permit operation of a car without one, regardless of age; though luckily America is not among those fascists (not sure if the UAE has rules like those). Here, if a car was not fitted from the factory with something that is considered mandatory now, it is exempt from those mandates. An owner can choose to retrofit any such items if he/she chooses, for good measure or for upgrade purposes; but such retrofits are not ever required.
In the 20 years I've had a starboard mirror on my car, not once have I driven without looking at it. Granted, part of that is simply aesthetics–I love the symmetrical appearance. But also, when properly adjusted, it actually does serve the purpose it's supposed to serve...however barely, due to the design flaw.
If/When you do acquire and install one for your prospective car, you must remember this very important rule regarding adjustment. It is supposed to be adjusted in conjunction with the central mirror, the one on the windshield. It is supposed to pick up line of sight that terminates at the central mirror's right edge. That means, for instance, as soon as a passing car's tail end is moving out of view of the central mirror's right-hand edge, the nose end of the same car should already be in the view of the starboard mirror. Ergo, no blind spot. But too many people–in fact, just about everybody in America save for me–adjust that mirror to show the side of their own vehicles. They're all wrong. If you see the side of your car in that mirror, you're just as blind as though the mirror were not even there.
---Tony
I appreciate all the responds.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests